When Brands Take Sides: Helpful or Harmful?

When Brands Take Sides: Helpful or Harmful?

⏱️ 4 min read

“Taking a stand is easy when there’s no risk involved.”
— Every brand ever, during Pride Month

TL;DR

Brands are increasingly vocal about causes, politics, and social movements. But does taking a stand help move the needle or just sell more products? While some corporate activism reflects genuine values, much of it is calculated PR. And consumers are noticing. The question isn’t whether brands should take sides. It’s whether their actions actually match their words.

The Rise of “Cause washing”

Social media rewards visibility. Brands know this. That’s why we see logos turn rainbow-colored in June, black squares posted during protests, and heartfelt commercials about social justice—often followed by zero actual change.

When a company speaks out, it can legitimize a movement. But when that speech is hollow, it cheapens the work and burns out supporters.

This phenomenon has a name: cause washing the corporate cousin of greenwashing. It’s when businesses borrow the language of change without committing to the labor of change.

When It Works (and When It Doesn’t)

Helpful:
- Patagonia suing the Trump administration over public lands protections.
- Ben & Jerry’s consistently backing up their social stances with legal action and internal accountability.
- REI closing stores on Black Friday to encourage outdoor time instead of consumption.

Harmful:
- Companies tweeting support for BLM while funding police PACs.
- Brands posting about Pride while lobbying against trans-inclusive legislation.
- Fast fashion brands “supporting sustainability” while dumping tons of unsold inventory.

The takeaway? We don’t need brands to be perfect. But we do need them to be consistent. Performative support erodes trust.

What Consumers Actually Want

People aren’t asking for brands to be neutral. They’re asking for them to be real.

That means:
- Transparency about political donations and partnerships
- Accountability when mistakes are made
- Action that aligns with values not just messaging that goes viral

In an age of receipts and screenshots, consumers are watching. And they’re increasingly willing to walk away from brands that say one thing and do another.

What We’re Doing at LiveImpact.io

LiveImpact.io is not a brand trying to look good. We're a civic tool trying to do good.

We're not powered by PR campaigns or influencer marketing. We’re powered by individuals logging real-world actions: donating, voting, volunteering, sharing trusted resources.

We don’t need brands to speak on our behalf. We need them to step aside and let people lead.

That’s why LiveImpact.io doesn’t monetize attention. It measures action. And it works the same whether or not a brand wants credit.

Signal or Noise?

The next time a brand posts a bold statement, ask:
- Are they risking anything?
- Are they doing anything?
- Are they changing anything internally?

It’s not wrong for brands to take sides. But it’s harmful when they take space from the very people doing the work.

Support the build of LiveImpact.io with a one-time $10 contribution:
https://www.gofundme.com/liveimpact
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

“We don’t need more brand statements. We need more shared action.”
— Rick Zwetsch